RNG NEWS

Stay up to date with the latest stories, insights, and announcements.
Guest User Guest User

Natural gas from expanded Roseville sewer plant to help fuel city vehicles

By Walter Ko, The Sacramento Bee.

Roseville City Council members voted unanimously Wednesday night to expand the city’s sewer plant and build facilities that recover energy from waste, including natural gas to power city garbage trucks.

“It provides us an opportunity to be innovative with this construction,” said Councilman Scott Alvord, who lives near the treatment plant. “The nice thing about it is that the project will cut down on odor and fuel city vehicles with recovered gas.”

Read more...

Read More
Guest User Guest User

Ethanol polls show strong RFS support, refuting API ‘push poll’

By Susanne Retka Schill, Ethanol Producer Magazine.

Ethanol advocates were quick to counter the most recent poll from the American Petroleum Institute with their own. The API poll released April 7 shows “consumers are concerned the Renewable Fuel Standard could hurt their pocketbooks,” according to the API news release.

“Sixty-eight percent of registered voters are concerned about the government requiring increased amounts of ethanol in gasoline and 74 percent agree that federal regulations could contribute to increased costs at the pump,” said API downstream group director Frank Macchiarola. “Consumers have spoken loud and clear. The results of a new national API poll on the ethanol mandate send another strong signal to policymakers that RFS reform is desperately needed.”

By Susanne Retka Schill, Ethanol Producer Magazine.

Ethanol advocates were quick to counter the most recent poll from the American Petroleum Institute with their own. The API poll released April 7 shows “consumers are concerned the Renewable Fuel Standard could hurt their pocketbooks,” according to the API news release.

“Sixty-eight percent of registered voters are concerned about the government requiring increased amounts of ethanol in gasoline and 74 percent agree that federal regulations could contribute to increased costs at the pump,” said API downstream group director Frank Macchiarola. “Consumers have spoken loud and clear. The results of a new national API poll on the ethanol mandate send another strong signal to policymakers that RFS reform is desperately needed.”

API further said 70 percent of voters think the use of more corn for ethanol could increase food prices; 59 percent oppose moving the point of obligation and just 20 percent support the change; and 75 percent are concerned about government requirements that could breach the blend wall.  

The Renewable Fuels Association called the API poll a push poll where questions are framed to be biased against the biofuels program. The RFA countered with the results of its own survey conducted by Morning Consult at about the same time as Harris Poll conducted the API survey. The RFA’s survey found that 58 percent of those polled support the RFS, with only 17 percent opposed – a  more than 3:1 margin of support for the RFS.

Read more...

Read More
Guest User Guest User

CKNW Energy Series: Phasing out non-renewable natural gas

By Janet Brown, CKNW News.

Today on CKNW‘s Energy Series, Janet Brown and Jon Hall look into the City of Vancouver’s adoption of the ‘Zero Emissions Building Plan’ and one of its various steps to reduce emissions in new buildings by 2030: eliminating non-renewable natural gas.

Doug Smith is a director of sustainability for the City of Vancouver, and he says the idea isn’t exactly that simple.

“It is not the goal, necessarily, to eliminate all natural gas. The goal is more in line with reducing greenhouse gases significantly. There’s some misinformation out there about how we’re moving away from natural gas and how we’re reducing our greenhouse gases. The reality is we’re looking at conservation and efficiency, first and foremost. The vast majority of what we’re doing is reducing the amount of energy we’re going to need to run the city. Whether that’s vehicles or whether that’s homes or buildings: it’s a reduction in energy.”

By Janet Brown, CKNW News.

Today on CKNW‘s Energy Series, Janet Brown and Jon Hall look into the City of Vancouver’s adoption of the ‘Zero Emissions Building Plan’ and one of its various steps to reduce emissions in new buildings by 2030: eliminating non-renewable natural gas.

Doug Smith is a director of sustainability for the City of Vancouver, and he says the idea isn’t exactly that simple.

“It is not the goal, necessarily, to eliminate all natural gas. The goal is more in line with reducing greenhouse gases significantly. There’s some misinformation out there about how we’re moving away from natural gas and how we’re reducing our greenhouse gases. The reality is we’re looking at conservation and efficiency, first and foremost. The vast majority of what we’re doing is reducing the amount of energy we’re going to need to run the city. Whether that’s vehicles or whether that’s homes or buildings: it’s a reduction in energy.”

Is the city of Vancouver basing this on a model in another Canadian city or somewhere else in the world?

“We’ve hired a company called ‘Navius’ to do our modeling for Vancouver, and it’s the same company both the federal government and provincial government use for their energy modeling. In fact, I believe some of the natural gas providers use them as well.”

Smith says this modeling has showed the city that there are many different paths to get towards an 80 per cent reduction in greenhouse gases.

“The paths that we’ve done don’t necessarily mean that’ll be exactly the path that we take, but we know it’s possible and it’s technically feasible. What we’re doing is actually a little bit behind the times. If you go to Europe, pretty well the standard building code in Europe is ‘Passive House,’ which is a building that needs almost no energy to stay warm in the winter. That’s eventually where all of North America’s gonna go, and the sooner cities like Vancouver can get there the more cost-effective that change will be, and the more economic benefit we’ll derive there.”

Read more...

Read More
Guest User Guest User

For L.A. Metro, natural-gas buses are clean and simple choice

By Marcus Gillette, Guest Commentary, LA Daily News.

This May, the board of the Los Angeles County Metropolitcan Transportation Authority (Metro) will vote on a decision to replace 1,000 aging diesel buses with a combination of new compressed-natural gas (CNG) models fueled by renewable natural gas and electric buses.

Because of their immediate availability, affordability and “cleaner-than electric’” characteristics, 800 of the new busses would be fueled by renewable natural gas. Because electric models are exponentially more expensive and because electric bus technology is still unproven and unreliable over long-distance routes such as those serviced by L.A. Metro, the remaining 200 are slated to be electric — to serve as a test program for future electrification of the transit agency.

By Marcus Gillette, Guest Commentary, LA Daily News.

This May, the board of the Los Angeles County Metropolitcan Transportation Authority (Metro) will vote on a decision to replace 1,000 aging diesel buses with a combination of new compressed-natural gas (CNG) models fueled by renewable natural gas and electric buses.

Because of their immediate availability, affordability and “cleaner-than electric’” characteristics, 800 of the new busses would be fueled by renewable natural gas. Because electric models are exponentially more expensive and because electric bus technology is still unproven and unreliable over long-distance routes such as those serviced by L.A. Metro, the remaining 200 are slated to be electric — to serve as a test program for future electrification of the transit agency.

However, some electric bus advocates are willing to disregard facts and risk decades of continued dependence on diesel.

In a guest commentary, “View from Porter Ranch: Metro must go electric to avoid more natural-gas risk” (Daily News, March 26), writer Patricia Larcara’s premise is that Metro should forego its use of natural-gas buses because of the leak at the Aliso Canyon natural gas storage facility.

The Southern California Gas Co. leak is unfortunate and should continue to be mitigated, and while the residents and environment surrounding Aliso Canyon continue to be on everyone’s mind, we must not confuse the issue or overlook the facts.

Read more...

Read More
Guest User Guest User

States, green groups urge DC Circuit to continue review of Clean Power Plan

By Robert Walton, Utility Dive.

Dive Brief:

  • In separate filings, two dozen states, cities and environmental groups have urged the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to continue with its review of the Clean Power Plan, despite a request from the White House to hold the proceeding in abeyance.
  • New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is leading the coalition of 24 states and cities; Environmental Defense Fund, Sierra Club, Earthjustice, Natural Resources Defense Council and other groups filed their own motion to continue the case.
  • President Trump last week signed an executive order directing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to review the Clean Power Plan and other power sector regulations. The agency then asked the D.C. Circuit to put the case on hold, but supporters of the emissions rule say that could delay the litigation indefinitely.

Read more...

Read More
Guest User Guest User

State appeals court upholds California's cap-and-trade program

By Chris Megerian, Los Angeles Times.

California's controversial cap-and-trade program, a cornerstone of the state's battle against climate change, has been upheld by a state appeals court.

Two judges on the appeals court panel sided with state officials who argued that the program, which requires companies to buy permits to release greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, fell within their authority to regulate industry. 

Read more...

Read More
Guest User Guest User

Duke University eyes biogas, not fossil fuels, for new power plant

By Elizabeth Ouzts, Southeast Energy News.

In the latest twist on the controversial power plant Duke University proposed last spring, an influential group of students, faculty and staff says it should be fueled from methane captured from hog waste, not natural gas.

“Duke University is committed to the investment necessary to utilize a percentage of biogas in the [plant] from day one of operation,” reads a fact sheet distributed at a community meeting last week on Duke’s campus in Durham, North Carolina.

By Elizabeth Ouzts, Southeast Energy News.

In the latest twist on the controversial power plant Duke University proposed last spring, an influential group of students, faculty and staff says it should be fueled from methane captured from hog waste, not natural gas.

“Duke University is committed to the investment necessary to utilize a percentage of biogas in the [plant] from day one of operation,” reads a fact sheet distributed at a community meeting last week on Duke’s campus in Durham, North Carolina.

The statement is one of several that’s garnered consensus from a select panel analyzing the 21-megawatt combined heat and power (CHP) plant, which is on holdfollowing a firestorm of criticism from outside and within the Duke community about its purported climate benefits.

Throughout the controversy, the university has said it was a ‘long-range goal’ to convert the hyper-efficient plant from natural gas to biogas. But now the 23-member subcommittee says it should be fueled at least partially with swine gas from the outset.

“I think we can get enough biogas in this plant the day it fires so that it’s carbon neutral,” said the group’s chair, Tim Profeta, who also leads Duke’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Solutions.

The subcommittee, which will report directly to the university’s board of trustees, has not yet finished its recommendations, and could do so as early as next week.

Read more...

Read More
Guest User Guest User

Lawmakers Aim to Safeguard Renewable Energy Credits in Tax Overhaul

By Brian Dabbs, Bloomberg BNA. 

Democrats and many Republicans are pushing to preserve a pair of recently revived renewable tax credits in a potential comprehensive overhaul of the tax code, lawmakers told Bloomberg BNA. 

An energy specialist, however, said those tax credits would have to be on the chopping block in a full overhaul. And Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) told Bloomberg BNA all options are available to free up revenue offsets that would pave the way for a paid-for overhaul. 

By Brian Dabbs, Bloomberg BNA. 

Democrats and many Republicans are pushing to preserve a pair of recently revived renewable tax credits in a potential comprehensive overhaul of the tax code, lawmakers told Bloomberg BNA. 

An energy specialist, however, said those tax credits would have to be on the chopping block in a full overhaul. And Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) told Bloomberg BNA all options are available to free up revenue offsets that would pave the way for a paid-for overhaul. 

The situation involving the tax credits is among the many indications that overhauling the tax code will be an extremely formidable task. The 2.3-cent-per-kilowatt-hour wind production tax credit will begin a phaseout in 2017 with a 2020 expiration, while a 30 percent tax credit for the solar industry will phase out from 2020 through 2022.

Because of the policy certainty provided by the wind phaseout, according to the American Wind Energy Association, 8 gigawatts of wind power capacity are now under construction or in advanced development. And the roughly 27 gigawatts of solar energy cumulatively installed in the U.S. at the end of 2015 are expected to reach nearly 100 gigawatts by the end of 2020, the Solar Energy Industries Association says.

Read more...

Read More
Guest User Guest User

New EPA documents reveal even deeper proposed cuts to staff and programs

By Juliet Eilperin, Chris Mooney and Steven Mufson, The Washington Post.

The Environmental Protection Agency has issued a new, more detailed plan for laying off 25 percent of its employees and scrapping 56 programs including pesticide safety, water runoff control, and environmental cooperation with Mexico and Canada under the North American Free Trade Agreement.

At a time when the agency is considering a controversial rollback in fuel efficiency standards adopted under President Obama, the plan would cut by more than half the number of people in EPA’s division for testing the accuracy of fuel efficiency claims by automakers.

It would transfer funding for the program to fees paid by the automakers themselves.

The spending plan, obtained by The Washington Post, offers the most detailed vision to date of how the 31 percent budget cut to the EPA ordered up by President Trump’s Office of Management and Budget would diminish the agency.

The March 21 plan calls for even deeper reductions in staffing than earlier drafts. It maintains funding given to states to administer waste treatment and drinking water. But as a result, the budget for the rest of EPA is slashed 43 percent.

The Trump administration says the EPA cuts reflect a philosophy of limiting federal government and devolving authority to the states, localities and, in some cases, corporations. But environmental groups say the Trump administration is answering the call of companies seeking lax regulation and endangering Americans’ air and water.

Read more...

Read More
Don’t miss an update—join our weekly newsletter below.